If the AI can query the data, what exactly is the BI team for?

The answer matters and it’s not what most people expect. The BI team isn’t becoming less relevant. It’s taking on a different kind of responsibility. We’re not here to build the reports anymore. We’re here to make sure the AI doesn’t get it wrong.

To understand why that answer is different now, you have to understand what the job used to look like.

For years, our job was clear. Build the dashboard, polish the numbers, make sure the right people had the right reports before the Monday morning meeting. We became experts at translating messy data into something a business could act on, even if the result was a graveyard of Zombie Dashboards that looked professional, got opened once, and were never touched again.

Now the ground is shifting under us. The reports aren’t going anywhere, but the way the business consumes data is changing fast, and with it, the expectations placed on us.

The Hidden Tax: Verification Debt

The new bottleneck in the enterprise isn’t data access. It is Verification Debt.

Verification Debt is the hidden cost of speed, the time and resources required to validate that an AI’s confident answer is actually true.

If an AI agent gives an executive a strategic answer in 10 seconds, but it takes a senior analyst two hours to audit the joins and validate the filters, you haven’t moved faster. You’ve simply traded Dashboard Fatigue for Trust Anxiety.

The Semantic Layer: Your Data’s Source of Truth

The answer to Verification Debt isn’t a new tool. It’s been sitting in your data stack for years, you just never needed it to do this much.

The semantic layer is where “net_revenue” stops being a column and becomes a defined, governed, auditable number. Most organizations have been treating it as a documentation exercise or a naming convention for analysts who can’t remember what a table does. Useful enough, but nowhere near what it’s capable of.

In the age of AI agents, the semantic layer becomes the formal contract between your data and every system that queries it.

Without it, your AI is making educated guesses and presenting them as facts. With it, every query runs through logic your team has deliberately defined and signed off on.

That’s the shift. And most organizations haven’t made it yet.

The Technical Pivot: From Human-Centric to Machine-Readable

Architecting a semantic layer for machines is a different job than maintaining one for humans. Most data teams have never had to, until now.

Business logic built for human eyes, executed literally by machines. That’s Verification Debt.

It starts with three shifts, not in tooling, but in how we think about the work.

1. Location: Get the logic out of the dashboard

If “gross margin” lives inside a dashboard, no AI querying your warehouse directly will ever find it. And you probably have three versions of it anyway, each built by a different analyst. A human knows to be suspicious. An AI doesn’t, it picks one and moves on. The fix isn’t to pick the right dashboard. It’s to stop using dashboards as the home of logic.

2. Depth: Naming is not defining

Naming a column gross_margin is not the same as defining it. A machine doesn't know if your margin is pre- or post-returns, blended or by SKU. Without enriched metadata (labels, descriptions, hierarchies, semantic annotations) your AI is pattern-matching on column names and hoping for the best.

Worth noting: tools like dbt, Looker, and Power BI are constantly expanding their semantic capabilities, making it easier to enrich your models with the context machines need. This space is moving fast. Keep an eye on it

3. Scope: Fewer models, fuller context

Most organizations have dozens of siloed reporting tables, each built for a specific stakeholder. That doesn’t scale when the consumer is an AI agent joining concepts across the entire business in a single query. The destination is fewer, more richly defined models that encode full business context.

And that’s before mentioning the efficiency gains, ingesting a table once across a unified semantic model beats maintaining the same logic duplicated across ten different models. Less redundancy, fewer inconsistencies, lower maintenance cost.

Each of these shifts has the same underlying goal: less room for the AI to go wrong without anyone noticing. That is the only way to pay down Verification Debt systematically, rather than auditing your way out of it one query at a time.

-

A flawed dashboard gets opened, questioned, and eventually ignored. A flawed semantic model gets queried by an AI agent that has no instinct for doubt, and that answer flows into executive briefings before anyone thinks to check it.

The error doesn’t stop at the edge of a report.

This is why the BI team’s role has changed in a way most organizations haven’t fully absorbed yet. The new mandate isn’t to build better reports. It’s to define the boundaries within which AI is allowed to be confident owning the semantic layer not as a folder of calculation tries and dummy columns, but as a living contract between your data and every system and stakeholder that touches it.

You cannot audit your way to trust after the response is sent.

That responsibility lands squarely on the BI team. And not many teams are prepared to assume it.

Get that contract right, and AI agents become a genuine force multiplier.

Get it wrong, and you haven’t accelerated your decision-making, you’ve just automated your mistakes.

-

If anything in this article maps to a conversation you’ve had internally, it’s probably a sign your semantic layer needs attention before your AI ambitions outpace it. At Astrafy, this is the work we do, helping data teams build the logic foundation that makes AI agents trustworthy, not just fast.

Reach out if you want to talk through where you stand.